Results
1. The first plot shows a corneal topography with an aside scale showing the corneal power’s maximum and minimum values. The difference between those two values is the astigmatism to be treated.

2. The second plot is the generated corneal geometry.
- Before proceeding with the corneal correction evaluation, you should check that the incision depth has not been excessive and, therefore, that has not produced any perforations.
- This can be checked by turning the geometry and verifying that the incisions are not shown in the rear face of the cornea. If that’s the case, the calculation must be repeated reducing the incision depth value (first section of this page).



3. The third plot is the tangential topography.
- Yellow-ish colors represent areas with more incurvation whereas colder colors represent areas with more flattening. Average values for incurvation and flattening are shown in the next plots.

4. The forth plot shows a blue line in the central area, representing the average power correction in the most curved axis. The arcuate will flatten the power value of this curved axis.

5. The fifth plot shows a blue line in the central area, representing the average power correction in the most flat axis. The arcuate will increase the power value of this flattened axis.

6. The combination of the 2 last two values (the average power correction in the most curved and flat axis) is the astigmatic correction for the arcuate.
- It is necessary to compare this values with the corneal astigmatic powers (minimum and maximum) from the first plot to check if there is an over-correction, under-correction or if the whole correction is valid. If disparate values are shown with respect to the target values, repeat the calculation adjusting the input data.